Showing posts with label Polk County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Polk County. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Results of the GOP Primary

First, the local: John Thompson handily defeated the old-school, hard-right challenger Kathie Freeman, 3700 to 1371.

Second, the statewide: Rick Perry won a clear majority, avoiding a runoff against Kay Bailey Hutchinson.

"From Driftwood, Texas, to Washington, D.C., we are sending you a message tonight: Stop messing with Texas," Perry told supporters, who spent the cold evening listening to country music and roasting marshmallows.


(Yes, because the fifth highest poverty rate in the nation combined with massive cuts in government aid to the poor and sick is something that really deserves to be DEFENDED.)

With Hutchinson's defeat, the main political question in the state is: will she honor her promise, which she's already altered twice, to resign her Senate seat after the primaries? The current oddsmakers say no; after all, bare-faced lying and hypocrisy have never hurt Republican candidates yet.

Of the five propositions put before Republican primary voters, all passed- and only the last, the requirement to get sonograms before getting abortions, passed with less than ninety percent of the vote. (The percentages on Prop. 5 were 69%/31% in favor.)

Although most incumbents easily defended against challengers on the Republican side, there are a couple of very interesting outcomes in contests for the Texas state school board races. The former chair of the board, and the driving force behind efforts to bring young-Earth creationism into science classes and far-right revisionist history into social studies, Don McLeroy, is almost certainly going to a recount... on the wrong end. Current unofficial returns show him losing to moderate Republican challenger Thomas Ratliff, 58,338 to 57,528- a difference of only 810 votes. Another hard-right Republican incumbent on the school board, Geraldine "Tincy" Miller, lost by a slightly larger margin to George M. Clayton, a school teacher running specifically against agenda-driven changes to the Texas state curriculum.

So, on that last point, perhaps there is some little hope for the future. At the least, if these numbers hold up, two of the seven young-Earthers on the fifteen-member state board of education will be thrown out.

And that's not counting what might happen if the Democrats find some previously unknown reserves of competence and actually win some races this year...

Monday, March 1, 2010

What's REALLY Important to Texas Republicans?

So, last week during early voting, I voted- for the first time in my life- in the Republican primary.

At some point the slimy feeling will wash off my body.

I voted in the GOP primary for two reasons: to support a Justice of the Peace candidate who has been very helpful to my family in recent years, and because there is no Democratic candidate for County Judge from the Democratic Party. (And the only ballot-qualified third party in Texas, the Libertarians, is no longer functional in Polk County, and hasn't been since I quit that party.)

The County Judge, in Texas government, is effectively the chief executive of county government. He presides over the Commissioners' Court- four or more (always an even number) representatives of districts throughout the county, who are responsible for basic county services in those districts. The County Judge sets the agenda, drives negotiations with business, and does such few executive tasks as devolve onto county-level government.

The incumbent, John Thompson, changed from a Democrat to a Republican five years ago, foreseeing that if he didn't he'd lose his job. His opponent, Kathie Freeman, is the wife of former Republican Party chair Danny Freeman, a long-time Republican stalwart.

Kathie Freeman did not impress me much, especially her performance in debates and public events as presented in what passes for our local county news media. I apologize for the horrible formatting, or lack thereof, of the source material, but here's the important points about Kathie Freeman:

Kathie Freeman concentrated her remarks on the need for cuts to the county budget and her belief Polk County should look closely before accepting funds from state or federal agencies, and should move toward being self-sufficient. Money from the state and federal governments is not “free money,” Freeman pointed out, and it “ultimately comes out of our pockets. I hope we could survive without that and we need to cut it out."

"Now that more than a year has passed since Ike made landfall, maybe it’s time for people to take responsibility for themselves and stop waiting for people to give them money," Freeman added.

. . .

Freeman also took credit for creating the Polk County Republican Club, an issue that has ruffled the feathers of businessman Doug Borie who has documentary evidence that his mother, Eloise Borie, led a Republican club here in the 1980s.

Freeman’s answer to the final question of the night shocked several county employees in the audience. “It seems to me county employees don’t have pride in the county,” Freeman said. “They’re just working there and that’s it. They need incentives. Let them clean up the community. Maybe we can cut their hours. There are always things that can be cut. Without looking at their hours, I don’t know what people are doing.”

. . .

Answering questions about procedures at the Polk Central Appraisal District and the recent 20 percent value increase for waterfront property, Thompson said he would defer to Freeman to explain the process since she spent four years on the PCAD board of directors. Freeman said the board of directors’ authority is limited to hiring and firing the chief appraiser. Later Freeman said the board does vote on the PCAD budget and she had fought to cut that budget, but did not get support from other directors.


The Polk County Enterprise version of this story goes on to add that other members of the appraisal district board, who served at the meeting, disputed Freeman's claims during the debate, forcing her to backtrack- only, apparently, to lie yet again.

So... a liar who tells lies so blatant that they can be INSTANTLY refuted, then responds with new lies... and whose idea of "motivating" employees is to cut their hours, cut their salaries, and force them to go out on trash pickup duty...

... sadly, as the preponderance of letters to the editor of another "news" source indicate, there's a very good chance such a person is exactly what Polk County Republicans want. It's not just Sarah Palin, y'all; it's an entire political movement.

But we'll find out about that tomorrow. That's not why I'm writing this.

When I voted in that Republican primary, I also voted on the five resolutions the Republican Party put on their ballot. These resolutions are usually either trial balloons or rally-the-troops efforts ahead of the state convention, so that those who run the party can demonstrate the support their declared positions have.

Here, from this source, are the five resolutions:

Ballot Proposition 1: Photo ID

The Texas legislature should make it a priority to protect the integrity of our election process by enacting legislation that requires voters to provide valid photo identification in order to cast a ballot in any and all elections conducted in the State of Texas.

Ballot Proposition 2: Controlling Government Growth

Every government body in Texas should be required to limit any annual increase in its budget and spending to the combined increase of population and inflation unless it first gets voter approval to exceed the allowed annual growth or in the case of an official emergency.

Ballot Proposition 3: Cutting Federal Income Taxes

In addition to aggressively eliminating irresponsible federal spending, Congress should empower American citizens to stimulate the economy by Congress cutting federal income taxes for all federal taxpayers, rather than spending hundreds of billions of dollars on so-called "federal economic stimulus".

Ballot Proposition 4: Public Acknowledgement of God

The use of the word "God", prayers, and the Ten Commandments should be allowed at public gatherings and public educational institutions, as well as be permitted on government buildings and property.

Ballot Proposition 5: Sonograms

The Texas Legislature should enact legislation requiring a sonogram to be performed and shown to each mother about to undergo a medically unnecessary, elective abortion.


... well, of COURSE I voted against all of them. Want an explanation why? Good, because you're getting one.

1) PHOTO ID TO VOTE

This is just part of an ongoing effort to discourage non-whites from voting. You already have to show photo ID to vote if you forget to bring your voter ID card to the polls. You shouldn't need to show the ID if you also have your voter ID. The net result will be to discourage minority-race people, who (justifiably) fear harrassment by mostly-white Texas cops and officials, from showing up to the polls to vote... which, in turn, means white Republican rule is strengthened.

2) CONTROLLING GOVERNMENT GROWTH

This is the same snake-oil Grover Norquist and his ilk have been pushing for the past thirty years- and it doesn't work. Look at California, where the Republicans managed to institute a requirement that two-thirds of their legislature is required to approve tax hikes. The state, despite massive budget cuts, prison overcrowding, and neglect of infrastructure, is rapidly going broke. Expenses can rapidly outstrip the growth of inflation or of the population, even without an "official emergency." This cap on budget growth is an irresponsible effort to "starve the beast", where the beast is government... the eventual goal, of course, to kill the beast altogether, and vital services be damned.

3) STOP THE STIMULUS

Um... without the stimulus package, we would be in a new Great Depression right now. Sadly, my Congressman, Kevin Brady, recently released a press statement claiming that the Recovery Act caused the loss of over four million jobs in the year since its passage- which, although easily disproven bullshit, plays well with the Republican base. There is also the fact that these "stimulative" income tax cuts the Republicans propose are almost entirely for the highest tax bracket- and utterly ignore those poor enough to pay little or no income tax whatever.

4) PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GOD

The Republicans refuse to recognize a simple fact: that atheism, paganism, Islam, Buddhism, and other religions have the same moral right to respect as Christianity. As such, they see no reason whatever not to force people at government events to acknowledge God, or to spend taxpayer dollars to acknowledge God (and, as former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore did, to ban other religious or secular displays that would compete with monuments to God). In short, Republicans have no respect whatever for people who believe differently from themselves- and are quite happy to shove their religion into those people's faces.

5) SONOGRAMS

Not only is this a naked attempt to scare or intimidate women into not having abortions, but it's also a major expense added on to all abortions. Sonograms can cost from $500 to $2000 depending on who performs them. A basic first-trimester abortion costs, on the average, only about $500 to $1000 by itself. The most striking thing about this proposition is that, unlike other Republican positions of the past, it avoids calling for a direct, immediate and total ban on all abortions.

So, what's most important to Texas Republicans this election season? Abortion, enforced religion, cutting taxes for the rich while cutting services and aid to the poor, and keeping non-whites away from the voting booth.

Yes, nice to see that Republicans, face with fewer jobs, higher costs of living, more people falling into poverty, disintegrating infrastructure, underperforming education systems, and a gradual social and economic drift towards Third World conditions, knows precisely what they think is more important than any of those things.

What I don't know is this: why would I, or any halfway intelligent person, want these people running government?

(BTW, I voted- as promised- for Debra Medina for Republican nominee for governor. Tomorrow's primary day- if you haven't voted yet, by all means go and do so- and vote Republican, for the worst candidates you can find. Let's see if the Democrats can find one or two candidates who won't fuck up, who might actually manage to win... and then, once in office, actually spend time undoing all the shit the Republicans have been doing the past twenty-thirty years.)

Monday, February 4, 2008

Say No to Trans-Texas Corridor

The following is a statement I will try to deliver Wednesday night, when the Texas Department of Transportation comes to Livingston to give an open house on its attempt to include the proposed I-69 project as part of the Trans Texas Corridor toll road project.


In 2005 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Kelo v. New London that governments may use the power of eminent domain to take homes and property from one person and give it to another for the purposes of private profit. Here in Texas the Republican Party voiced their outrage at this ruling and promised to pass laws to forbid any such abuses within the state of Texas.

The eminent domain bill that actually came out of the legislature was a toothless, worthless document. It did not require that property owners be paid market value for their property or recompense for loss of access to property not taken. It allowed state and local officials to declare property "blighted", take it, and give it free to private developers. It had a list of exemptions a mile long- exemptions for new private wharves and yacht harbors in Freeport, exemptions for the new stadium for the Dallas Cowboys in Arlington, and most notably Governor Rick Perry's Trans Texas Corridor project. Perry signed this measure, this sham of a law, and called it reform.

In 2007 the Legislature came back and tried to close some of these loopholes. It tried to remove the power to declare property blighted. It tried to force the government to pay fair market value for property seized. This bill passed with veto-proof margins in both houses.

Rick Perry waited until the Legislature adjourned, then vetoed it.

Why did Rick Perry veto this second, substantial reform? Because Rick Perry wants to take our homes. Rick Perry wants to give our property to a handful of toll road corporations and land developers. And Rick Perry does not want us to be able to stop him.

In 2002 Rick Perry announced his Trans Texas corridor as a solution to the problem of "rural interstate congestion." There is no such thing as rural interstate congestion. There is, however, such a thing as over $800,000 in campaign donations from toll road interests into Rick Perry's campaign funds in 2001 alone- with hundreds of thousands of dollars since.

Ric Williamson, Perry's hand-chosen head for the Transportation Commission, has told us that, quote, "It's either toll roads, slow roads or no roads." This is by design. In the biannual budget for 2007 Rick Perry assigned 40% of the state's highway budget to the Trans Texas Corridor. By an amazing coincidence, maintenance of existing roads amounts to 60% of the budget. Perry and his supporters, including our very own representative John Otto, have deliberately rigged the state budget to create a shortfall in the highway budget to both fund and justify building toll roads. To quote Commissioner Williamson again: "In your lifetime most existing roads will have tolls." This is their ambition: to force you to pay a toll every time you leave your driveway.

Governor Perry claims the only way Interstate 69 will be built is through the Trans Texas Corridor project. This is wrong. What will be built under Trans Texas is not an interstate. Nearly a third of the projected I-69 project is either already built or can be built with no additional taking of private property. Trans Texas Corridor would bypass virtually all this existing freeway.

In its place Trans Texas Corridor would build a highway with exits spaced as far apart as twenty miles, cutting off access to towns like Livingston, Corrigan, and smaller villages. The Trans Texas Corridor would be over five times as wide as a standard interstate... with no access roads. If the bypass around Livingston became the center of the Trans Texas Corridor route, everything from the Brookshire Brothers store to Long King Creek would be taken, flattened, and handed over to a Spanish corporation... and it still wouldn't be wide enough.

Furthermore, the developers of Trans Texas would build their own restaurants, gas stations, and hotels within the Corridor... property wholly exempt from county or city property taxes, causing all other residents' taxes to go up. The result would be not an expansion of the local economy, but a sharp decline.

Trans Texas Corridor does not help our area. Trans Texas Corridor will take half a million acres statewide to build over four thousand miles of toll road, almost entirely in areas where they are not needed. In urban areas such as Austin it will convert highways already built, paid for at taxpayer expense, into toll roads. It will take homes and pay homeowners pennies on the dollar. It will split counties in half and shut farmers and property owners out of their land. Worst of all, it will triple-tax Texas citizens- once to pay for the construction, then again for auto registration, then a third time for the toll.

Finally: in the past, toll roads were built to cover only the initial cost of construction, after which they were made freeways. This is not true of Trans Texas. The leases, contracts, and agreements involved with this project have terms of as long as seventy years. That means, if this project were completed tomorrow, not a single person in this room tonight would live to see the toll booths taken down. And those tolls would not go to maintain the roads or build new ones: they would go into the pockets of a handful of corporate interests. Instead our tax dollars- which would go ever higher- would be used to maintain these roads built not for our sake, but for the sake of rich men getting richer.

I am oppposed to the Trans Texas Corridor project. I am opposed to Rick Perry, Ric Williamson, John Otto, County Judge John Thompson, and all other supporters of the Trans Texas Corridor project. In November my votes will all be NO for this proposal and YES for those who will go to Austin, repeal the Trans Texas Corridor Act, and shut this project down.

We do not need this boondoggle.

We do not WANT this boondoggle.

Do not BUILD this boondoggle.


Anyone want to give odds on whether or not I'll actually be able to say a word of this?

Didn't think so.